Close Menu
  • Gaming
    • All Gaming
    • Nintendo
    • PlayStation
    • Xbox
    • PC Gaming
    • Card & Tabletop
    • VR
  • Features
    • Editorials
    • Interviews
    • The Anime Pulse
  • Guides
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • Anime & Animation
    • Movies and TV
    • Books
    • Manga & Comics
    • Toys
    • Geek
    • Culture
  • Previews
  • Reviews
    • All Reviews
    • Video Game
    • Anime & Animation
    • Movie & TV
    • Comic Book & Manga
    • Tech & Gear
    • Food
    • Book
    • Toys
    • Tabletop and Card Game
  • Podcasts
    • A-01 Podcast
    • Nintendo Entertainment Podcast
    • Spectator Mode Podcast
  • Contact Us
X (Twitter) YouTube RSS Bluesky Discord
X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube Bluesky Discord
The OuterhavenThe Outerhaven
  • Latest
  • Features
  • Guides
  • Previews
  • Reviews
    • Video Game Reviews
    • Anime & Animation Reviews
    • Comic Book & Manga Reviews
    • Films & TV Reviews
    • Tech Reviews
    • Tabletop and Card Game Reviews
    • Toy Reviews
  • Gaming
    • PlayStation
    • Nintendo
    • Xbox
    • PC Gaming
    • Retro Gaming
    • Tabletop
    • Virtual Reality
  • Entertainment
    • Anime & Animation
    • Comic Books & Manga
    • Films & TV
    • Original English Light Novels DB
    • OELN DB
    • Culture
    • Books
    • Toys
  • Tech
  • Podcasts
    • A-01 Podcast
    • Nintendo Entertainment Podcast
    • Spectator Mode Podcast
The OuterhavenThe Outerhaven
Home»News»Gaming News»Metacritic changes user review policy to combat review bombing

Metacritic changes user review policy to combat review bombing

By Keith MitchellJuly 18, 2020

It looks like Metacritic finally wised up and is now forcing a 36-hour window for all user reviews posted to the site. What this means is that review bombing should be less, at least for the initial day or so. It won’t stop those from completely laying into a game after the 36-hours after that game is released, but it’s a start. 

It’s no secret that Metacritic has been suffering from review bombing over the past few years, with several high profile games having their review scores sabotaged. With this change, no one outside of influencers and gaming journalists, those who have had access to a game for longer than 36-hours will be able to provide a review score on Metacritic.

We recently implemented the 36 hour waiting period for all user reviews in our games section to ensure our gamers have time to play these games before writing their reviews. This new waiting period for user reviews has been rolled out across Metacritic’s Games section and was based on data-driven research and with the input of critics and industry experts

Whether this works or not, that remains to be seen. Metacritic isn’t the one that’s experienced review bombing as Steam’s review system has also been a victim. So far, Steam has made several changes to help prevent this and has been mildly successful. This including validating that only those who purchased a game could support a score. This isn’t something that Metacritic could implement since they don’t distribute games.

They could implement a system where the reviewer would need to submit their Gamertag, and then they can check how long that person played the game. Sure, you can still game that system, but it would be a start.

To be completely honest, as I pointed out above, this is only to help initially. Those who are dead set on plummeting a review score will wait the 36 hours and then still add a fake score.

The only way to completely get rid of review bombing is to not allow user review scores at all. Which is something that the other popular game review aggregator, OpenCritic, currently does. Yes. that would present another set of issues, such as not allowing those who aren’t influencers and gaming journalists to provide scores. Something of which I feel needs to be a thing. Yet, it’s been apparent that if you have an open review system that’s exploitable, then people will exploit it.

At the end of the day, a review score is subjective. Review scores are merely a reference point that you don’t have to follow, yet they have constantly been the subject of contention.

We’ll see how this new implementation works out for Metacritic in the meanwhile.

metacritic Review Bombing
Keith Mitchell - Headshot-PS_Gear_400x400
Keith Mitchell
  • X (Twitter)
  • LinkedIn

Keith D. Mitchell is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of The Outerhaven, where he has been covering video games and technology for more than 14 years. A lifelong PC gamer, he began building PCs at just eight years old and still loves talking about hardware as much as playing games. His passion for challenging experiences has made him a devoted Soulslike fan, having beaten nearly every FromSoftware release. Keith regularly attends major gaming and technology events to bring firsthand coverage to readers, and continues to enjoy writing about the games and gear that shaped his love for the industry.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Latest Posts

Nintendo Music Adds Golden Sun The Lost Age OST!

September 9, 2025

A Pokemon Spinoff Title Is Being Teased By Certain Insiders

September 8, 2025

How Did Princess Peach Get The Name Of Princess Toadstool?

September 8, 2025

Specialite EN Announces End of Operations

September 8, 2025

Xbox Returns to Tokyo Game Show 2025 With Ninja Gaiden 4 and ROG Xbox Ally X

September 8, 2025

The World’s Strongest Rearguard: Labyrinth Country’s Novice Seeker Receives TV Anime

September 8, 2025
About Us • Our Team • Contact Us • Privacy Policy • Review Policy • Ethics Policy 
Work With Us • Reviews on Open Critic • Reviews on CriticDB
Copyright @2025 The Outerhaven Productions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.